Irem Kurt vs Mandegar Farzami Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

Published on 06 Sep at 12:48 AM UTC

HEAD TO HEAD

I. Kurt vs M. Farzami

Irem Kurt
Irem Kurt

Flag TUR TUR

w
w
l
w
l
l
w
l
w
l
Mandegar Farzami
Mandegar Farzami

Flag IRI IRI

w
w
l
w
w
w
l
w
l
l

1

Win

1

Played

0

Win

18
Age
19
-
Height
-
895
C. Rank
0
884
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Head-to-head: Kurt 1 - 0 Farzami

They have played 2 sets in total, with Irem Kurt winning 2 and Mandegar Farzami winning 0. The last match between Irem Kurt and Mandegar Farzami was at the W15 Kayseri, 06-09-2025, Round: SF, Surface: Hard, with Irem Kurt getting the victory 6-1 6-4.

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Kurt1
Farzami0
Last 1 H2H Matches:

(SFW15 Kayseri(09-06-25)

Hard
TUR Flag
Irem Kurt
6
6
IRI Flag
Mandegar Farzami
1
4

I. Kurt vs M. Farzami H2H Profile

Stats
$0Career Prize Money$0
42.86% (30-40)Career Total W/L51.61% (16-15)
1Hard0
1Total H2H Matches0
0% (0-0)YTD Win/Loss0% (0-0)

I. Kurt vs M. Farzami Match Preview:

  • In terms of second serve points, Kurt edges slightly ahead, winning 34.68% compared to Farzami's 33.07% in recent form. Could this give Kurt a slight advantage in crucial rallies?
  • Farzami, however, excels in return games, capturing 50.99% of opponent's second serve points, compared to Kurt's 48.89%, as well as leading 36.46% to 28.3% on first serve returns. Is this a key factor in setting the pace?
  • When under pressure, Kurt has a minimal edge by saving 45.63% of breakpoints over Farzami’s 43.81%, suggesting resilience could slightly favor him.
  • Farzami has shown stronger overall match performance over the last year with a 55.56% win rate compared to Kurt's 40%. Does experience play a role here?
  • Both players favor hard courts, but Farzami showcases superiority with an 80% win rate versus Kurt's 56%, hinting at a possible edge on this surface.
  • Opponent strength over the last 12 months has been tougher for Farzami, with his opponents' average rank at 172.89, higher than Kurt's 209.8 ranked opponents, potentially honing Farzami's skills at a higher level.
  • On deciding sets, both players have a similar 33% win rate, indicating a potential evenly matched battle if it comes to a final set showdown.
  • When looking at breakpoint opportunities, Farzami narrowly leads with a 39.13% conversion, slightly better than Kurt’s 38.1%, possibly giving him an edge in critical moments.

Editorial Prediction (September 6, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing recent performance patterns, both players present strengths and comparable weaknesses, although Farzami's superiority in return games could disrupt Kurt's service rhythm.

Despite Kurt's slight lead in second serve effectiveness and break point saves, Farzami's better match win record over the past year could suggest a consistency advantage that may be pivotal in this matchup.

Their hard court proficiency further leans this encounter in Farzami’s favor. Adding the challenging opponent caliber he has faced also enhances his adaptability and strategic depth.

Considering these factors, Farzami holds a marginal edge leading into this match and is most likely to emerge victorious.

Irem Kurt vs Mandegar Farzami Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

I. Kurt vs M. Farzami H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
1H2H Matches Won0
2Sets Won0
12Games Won5
2Total Double Faults1
1:36:51Average Match Time1:36:51
66% (43/65)1st Serve %66% (37/56)
65% (28/43)1st Serve Win %43% (16/37)
55% (12/22)2nd Serve Win %47% (9/19)
50% (5/10)Break Pts Won %40% (2/5)
55% (31/56)Return Points Win %38% (25/65)
100% (1/1)Best‑of‑3 Win %0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)1st Set Won, Won Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)1st Set Won, Lost Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Kurt 41%, Farzami 43%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Kurt 59%, Farzami 60%.
Break Points Saved %: Kurt 51%, Farzami 55%.

I. Kurt Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
ClayW35 Antalya - 24-11-2025

R2

BULL. Karatancheva
L
1-6 6-3 6-0

R1

ITAG. Bestetti
W
6-4 4-6 6-4
HardW15 Sharm ElSheikh - 10-11-2025

R2

EGYS. Samir
L
6-4 6-0

R1

KAZA. Sagandikova
W
6-4 6-4
HardW15 Sharm ElSheikh - 03-11-2025

R1

RUSD. Belyaeva
L
7-5 6-4

M. Farzami Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardW15 Tashkent - 27-10-2025

R1

KAZA. Arystanbekova
L
6-3 7-6(3)
HardW15 Tashkent - 20-10-2025

R2

BLRD. Khomutsianskaya
L
6-1 6-0

R1

UZBE. Kim
W
6-1 6-0
HardW15 Kayseri - 01-09-2025

SF

TURI. Kurt
L
6-1 6-4

QF

CROA. Esina
W
7-6(2) 6-1
banner

I. Kurt vs M. Farzami Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
42.86% (30/40)YTD Win/Loss51.61% (16/15)
42.67% (64/86)Sets Win/Loss52.31% (34/31)
47.08% (636/715)Games Win/Loss52.29% (297/271)
56.52% (13/10)Hard Win/Loss64.29% (9/5)
35.56% (16/29)Clay Win/Loss41.18% (7/10)
50.00% (1/1)Indoor Hard W/L0% (0/0)
0.05Aces Per Game0.01
35Aces Total4
0.23Double Faults Per Game0.06
149Total Double Faults17
1st MatchAverage Match Time1st Match
245.01Average Opponent Rank243.84
61% (1857/3049)1st Serve %74% (807/1090)
57% (1061/1857)1st Serve Win %58% (471/807)
40% (481/1192)2nd Serve Win %42% (119/283)
45% (177/390)Break Points Won % (Total)53% (71/133)
45% (1416/3120)Return Points Win %48% (520/1086)
25.00% (2/6)Challenger W/L0% (0/0)
45.16% (28/34)Futures W/L51.61% (16/15)
42% (29/69)Best of 3 Sets Win %52% (16/31)
22% (2/9)Tiebreaks Win % (Total)67% (4/6)
55% (6/11)Deciding Set Win %33% (1/3)
93% (30/28)1st Set Won, Won Match100% (16/16)
7% (30/2)1st Set Won, Lost Match0% (16/0)
5% (40/2)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (15/0)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

Fri, 28 Nov, 08:00 AM
Prediction
KAZD. Yevseyev4
SUIJ. Nikles
W1
1.84
W2
1.84
Fri, 28 Nov, 10:00 AM
Prediction
UKRV. Ursu5
GBRJ. Clarke2
W1
3.08
W2
1.31
Fri, 28 Nov, 02:00 PM
Prediction
SVKA. Martinq
RUSA. VatutinLL
W1
1.62
W2
2.13
Fri, 28 Nov, 09:30 AM
Prediction
SUIH. Ouzilouq
BULG. Lazarovq
W1
1.72
W2
1.98
Fri, 28 Nov, 08:30 PM
Prediction
ARGJ. P. Ficovich1
COLN. Barrientosq
W1
1.4
W2
2.68
Fri, 28 Nov, 01:00 PM
Prediction
ESPI. M. Curbeloq
RUSI. Simakin2
W1
3.84
W2
1.21